Read, Name, Section, Definition, Cases. Read, Qanun-e-Shahadat Order , 1 , Short title, extent and commencement, Cases · Read, Qanun-e-Shahadat. Spureme Court on Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, with all amendments & up-to -date Supreme Court case law. Responsibility: by Ishfaq Ali. Edition: 1st ed. Law Vision is one of the Projects Launched by the LAWVISION. This Site has in- fact opened the door for actual Comprehensive Laws and legal services on the.
|Published (Last):||4 September 2006|
|PDF File Size:||20.11 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Provided that such document is substantially in the form and purports to be executed in the manner directed by law in that behalf. Production of secondary evidence. Statement of a witness which was general in nature would be hardly of any worth in proof of a specific issue.
Agreement to refer the dispute to arbitration. Admission by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit: The facts that, shortly before the robbery, B went to a fair with money in his qanoon e shahadat order 1984, and that he showed it or mentioned the fact that he had it, to third person, are relevant.
When the petitioner had not been able to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that the members had defected from their political party, the members had not become disqualified from being members of the Provincial Assembly. Such remarks having shaahadat obtained syahadat cross-examination were not voluntary and were, thus, privileged. A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor qanoon e shahadat order 1984 the accused within the meaning of this Article.
Admissibility of certified copies in evidence. Privilege in respect of.
It remained in existence ever since which enhanced its evidentiary value. Members of family should be presumed to have special means to depose in respect of relationship under Art. Roshan PLD Quetta 44 rel.
Power of attorney–Mode of proof.
Whenever, under the provisions of the law for the time being in force relating to civil procedure, any Court records on issue qanoon e shahadat order 1984 fact, the fact to be asserted or denied in the answer to such issue is a fact in issue. At the same time, objections as to admissibility of documents were to be raised at the earliest and usually at the time such were exhibited and admitted m evidence.
Qanun-e-Shahadat, however, does not apply to proceedings before an arbitrator. Document tendered in evidence and exhibited ordet the trial without any objection-Effect-Where no objection had been raised at the time of tendering and exhibiting of evidence before the trial Court or even before the lower appellate forum, no objection could be raised in second appeal.
Facts relevant when right or custom is in question: The fact that at the time when A represented C to be solvent, C was supposed to be solvent by his neighbours and by persons dealing with him, is relevant, ehahadat showing that A made the representation in good faith.
Witnesses deposing as to relationship of parties did not belong to the concerned village and were not on visiting terms with the qanoon e shahadat order 1984 families. At the same time, proof of a qanoon e shahadat order 1984 was not the equivalent of its relevancy; the two were independent concepts.
Character as affecting damages: Nothing could be brought out in the cross-examination of recording Magistrate which could cast doubt as to the veracity of the contents of the dying declaration which was made in Urdu and translated into Sindhi and English.
Agreement to sell does not require to be attested by witnesses and in this view, provision of Art. Appraisal of evidence by Appellate Court was strictly in accordance with rules of evidence. Facts bearing upon opinions of experts: The facts that B procured arms in Europe for the purpose of the conspiracy, C collected money in Peshawar for a like object, D persuaded persons to join the qanoon e shahadat order 1984 in Karachi. Number of witnesses to be produced Sufficiency of the number of witnesses to be produced in a case may depend upon the qanoon e shahadat order 1984 and circumstances of each particular case.
The question is whether A has a right to a fishery. Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent qanokn, the truth of facts therein stated: Document, by any law, was required to be attested, production of attesting witness, if alive, held, was mandatory requirement-In absence of such requirement under any law for attestation of document by a witness, there would be no legal requirement to qanoon e shahadat order 1984 attesting witness to prove such document.
P L D Supreme Curt Court can convict an accused person on the testimony of one dependable witness.
The Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, (10 of )
Statements made by A during his illness as to his symptoms are relevant facts. The communication, being made in furtherance of a criminal purpose, is not protected from disclosure. Children are a most untrustworthy class of witnesses, for, being of lender age, they often mistake dreams for reality, repeat glibly as of their own qanoon e shahadat order 1984 what they have heard from others and are greatly influenced by fear of punishment, by hope of reward and by desire of notoriety.
Documents are to be proved through their authors or scribes or witnesses in whose presence such ware written or signed or as are acquainted with the writing qanoon e shahadat order 1984 signatures of the author or through expert evidence or by comparison of signatures or upon admission etc. When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant: The fact that a letter written by him is dated on that day is relevant.
Remarks of witness, during judicial proceeding did not appear to have been wanton, reckless or beyond the ordwr of inquiry.